Bachelor
In contrast with the term ‘spinster ‘.
When looking at the oxford dictionary, the earliest record
of when bachelor was first used in 1297.In which was used to describe young
knights, by which had positive connotations such as strong, courageous, brave.
This term addresses no stigmatisation due to an unmarried status. The nature of
the term spinster is used to shame and attach a negative label to whoever is
described as one, however evidence of the late 13th century suggests
that the male equivalent term used to describe the exact same unmarried status,
is one that has had connotations of strong and brave; something people would
look up to.
The word then has been modified in 1883 in which whomever is
labelled as bachelor is described as someone who has been knighted- a gentleman
who has received the honour of knighthood. This adds weight to the connotations
of bachelor being of a positive light – someone who has been knighted is known
to be someone who is strong, courageous and brave. This again has no relevance
to the negative label of not being married – or even touches focus on the issue
if the man is unmarried. “1883 Whitaker's
Almanack 108 Knights Bachelors: a list of those
Gentlemen [in number 278] who have received the honour of knighthood.”
In my opinion, the term bachelor has changed its meaning and
what it is addressing, however it has still carried positive connotations as in
today’s context, if someone is described as a bachelor- it is not frowned upon
and contains connotations of strong, wealth and independence. Especially in
today’s society, you wouldn’t refer to an unmarried woman as bachelor as it is
a strongly marked form. No ‘knights’ are referred to as a ‘her’ or ‘she’ in
these definitions, suggesting that bachelor, in this context specifically, is
potentially also a marked form and that women wouldn’t have been included in
this definition even in the 19th century. This has then had the
effect of removing women from this definition of being strong, courageous and
brave, therefore this has potentially removed women from being described as
similar positive labels when being stated as unmarried. An example of today’s
context this is that bachelor is often paired in the term with eligible;
meaning if a man was described as this they are considered to
be a particularly desirable potential husband, usually due to wealth, social
status or other specific personal qualities. This is still describing an
unmarried man, however the term ‘eligible spinster’ is not used and wouldn’t
make sense if it was used due to the term ‘spinster’ creating negative
connotations.
The word ‘ bachelor’ has changed from its primary meaning
over time, in which it began to mean an unmarried man in the late 19th
century, meaning that the word has changed meaning to be a man worthy of the
honour of being knighted, to man who simply isn’t married.
There is evidence that displays a wide use of this word, for
example there are different spellings of the word such as bachiler, bachillier,
baculere, Bachler. The extent of the phonology within one word suggests that
there has been a wide use of the word from many different areas; displaying the
popularity of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment