Throughout this dialogue, there are three main participants
that present different aspects of the conversation. For the purpose of this
essay and the transcript, I have titled the speaker’s person one, two and
three. This dialogue is taken place within school and is between three people
having a conversation during their free period.
For the duration of this transcript, it is evident that person
2 is the most frequent speaker, insinuating that this is the most dominant
person within this conversation. I can see this as person 2 is the person that
is asking the most questions and is the instigator of all the pairs of
adjency’s; for example at the very beginning of the conversation; person 2
questions ‘’what?’’, demanding person 3 to explain themselves. Person 2 also
asks ‘’ what time we leaving later?’’, this is directed to person 1 in which
they reply ‘’erm I dunno; like twenty to six”. Both of these parts of the
dialogue show that person 2 is the most dominant speaker within this
conversation, this is because the questioner has the power to control and shape
the topics within the conversation. It complements the fact that person 2 is
the most dominant speaker, as person 2 is male. Male dominance is known to be
common within a conversation with both males and females; male’s tone of
conversation is normally very competitive and hyped up. Men are known to try
and all gain the power within the conversation, and be the ones that are able
to shape where the conversation goes. This shines through within my transcript
as person 2, the male, is the one that is majority of the time the main
questioner and instigator of different conversation topics. However, an issue
with power within a conversation is that it is negotiable. An example of this
throughout the transcript is when the power of conversation is juggled between
person 1 and 3; person 3 (female) instigates an adjancy pair when she says
‘’what lesson have you got next’’, however this question isn’t satisfied with
an answer as person 1(male) overrules person three’s question and interrupts by
stating ‘’ I’ve only got one lesson today”. The power within the conversation
is negotiated at one segment of the conversation, however the power in this
transcript always escalates back to person two, showing they are the most
confident and outgoing within that circle of people.
Within this transcript, there is a lot of turn taking between
the speakers. This illustrates the relationship between the speakers and how
they converse with each other. Turn taking allows for the conversation to run
smoothly therefore includes only one person talking at the same time and no
silence. At one point, this wasn’t carried out within the transcript as person
1 does interrupt person 3’s question, however for the rest of the dialogue,
turn taking does run smoothly and only one person talks at the same time. If
the turn taking is appointed by one speaker to the other this illustrates that
the tone of conversation is very formal and professional (e.g teacher and a
student), however if the speaker takes it on themselves to continue the
conversation, or move on from that topic, then it implies the relationship
between the speakers are relaxed and of a friendly manner.
This transcript also includes many elipses. This is when
parts of words or phrases are missed out. An example of this is when person 2
says ‘’ what time we leaving later ‘’ as a pose to “what time are we leaving later”. This is also done when person 3 replies
‘’erm I dunno like twenny to six’’, instead of “erm, im not sure, twenty to
six”. This will depend on a person’s accent or the area you are from, but from
this it illustrates the fact that the conversation is informal and relaxed,
therefore no one is worrying what impressions they are giving to other people.
The register of this transcript is very informal as it is between three friends
therefore there is no position of authority demanding a formal tone of speech
and structure.
A good effort Chelsea. Please try to use your knowledge of language levels and theory to develop your analysis further. AJK
ReplyDelete